<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Strikes Hard With Chrome But &#8220;Oh No, Not Another Browser Again!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/</link>
	<description>I am a multifaceted geek: a web developer, a web designer, and an overall website specialist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Jamieson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Jamieson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in love with google chrome. I&#039;ve tried IE8 b2, and google wins hands down. Still too many rendering issues with IE8. It&#039;s like chromes older retarded brother that just doesn&#039;t &quot;get it&quot;.

Also, the rendering engine in chrome is webkit. So if you build your sites to standards and have also tested in Safari, then you won&#039;t have a problem. 

Hopefully we can leave IE to sink!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in love with google chrome. I&#8217;ve tried IE8 b2, and google wins hands down. Still too many rendering issues with IE8. It&#8217;s like chromes older retarded brother that just doesn&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, the rendering engine in chrome is webkit. So if you build your sites to standards and have also tested in Safari, then you won&#8217;t have a problem. </p>
<p>Hopefully we can leave IE to sink!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisTheFeral</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisTheFeral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>BTW,
Firefox 3.1 will also have an incognito mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW,<br />
Firefox 3.1 will also have an incognito mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisTheFeral</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisTheFeral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree there.
Once Chrome is full released, it&#039;s plugin support will go crazy and with it being SO MUCH faster than firefox and so much more reliable, this is defiantly the BEST browser I have EVER used... and it&#039;s only in beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree there.<br />
Once Chrome is full released, it&#8217;s plugin support will go crazy and with it being SO MUCH faster than firefox and so much more reliable, this is defiantly the BEST browser I have EVER used&#8230; and it&#8217;s only in beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacBros</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>MacBros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-457</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using it for awhile now. I like the speed, but miss my Twitterfox plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using it for awhile now. I like the speed, but miss my Twitterfox plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hands-On Internet Marketing Strategies</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Hands-On Internet Marketing Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>I, for one will stick with Firefox for the time being.
Thanks,
JR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one will stick with Firefox for the time being.<br />
Thanks,<br />
JR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ad Infinitum</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ad Infinitum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>I personally love it. Why? Obviously the speed. But I also like the minimalistic approach( for that reason i used safari for a while). As I usually have 4-5-6 windows open in the same time it helps keep clutter down.

Another nifty thing about it is the way the adress bar gives site/ search suggestions as you type. Much like the google toolbar on FF or IE.

Sadly the reason I will not be switching to it is because of the addon support that firefox has. I have 2 custom toolbars and several addons that do not work on it yet. If by some miracle google can get firefox toolbars to work on chrome or if it pulls something even more amazing out of its hat I&#039;ll be all over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally love it. Why? Obviously the speed. But I also like the minimalistic approach( for that reason i used safari for a while). As I usually have 4-5-6 windows open in the same time it helps keep clutter down.</p>
<p>Another nifty thing about it is the way the adress bar gives site/ search suggestions as you type. Much like the google toolbar on FF or IE.</p>
<p>Sadly the reason I will not be switching to it is because of the addon support that firefox has. I have 2 custom toolbars and several addons that do not work on it yet. If by some miracle google can get firefox toolbars to work on chrome or if it pulls something even more amazing out of its hat I&#8217;ll be all over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Raul II</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>John Raul II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it is really fast hands down. But take a look, it is plagued with a lot of issues: 

http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/request.py?contact_type=known_issues_2

Things like these are what Microsoft and Mozilla are referring to as &quot;experience.&quot; Chrome lacks it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it is really fast hands down. But take a look, it is plagued with a lot of issues: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/request.py?contact_type=known_issues_2" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/request.py?contact_type=known_issues_2</a></p>
<p>Things like these are what Microsoft and Mozilla are referring to as &#8220;experience.&#8221; Chrome lacks it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Google Chrome is really fast!
Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):
http://ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome is really fast!<br />
Now I can sort 200,000 records inside of Browser (Chrome) just in 1 sec. (Faster than Microsoft Excel):<br />
<a href="http://ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm" rel="nofollow">http://ardentedge.com/ex_if.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Raul II</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>John Raul II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Yeah true. Considering Chrome is still Beta, same with IE 8 Beta 2, they look very promising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah true. Considering Chrome is still Beta, same with IE 8 Beta 2, they look very promising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tino</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>tino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnraul.com/google-strikes-hard-with-chrome-but-oh-no-not-another-browser-again/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>its been 2 days since they released it... just use it a long side firefox or IE 8... you&#039;ll see what i mean.. hek3x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its been 2 days since they released it&#8230; just use it a long side firefox or IE 8&#8230; you&#8217;ll see what i mean.. hek3x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

