<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Raul dot Com &#187; Opensource</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnraul.com/tag/opensource/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnraul.com</link>
	<description>I am a multifaceted geek: a web developer, a web designer, and an overall website specialist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:46:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	
<!-- Start Of Script Generated By WP-PostViews Plus -->
<script type='text/javascript' src='http://www.johnraul.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js?ver=1.6.1'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/* ]]> */
</script>
<!-- End Of Script Generated By WP-PostViews Plus -->
	<item>
		<title>Media Player Classic: Still The Best Media Player – Even In Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/media-player-classic-still-the-best-media-player-%e2%80%93-even-in-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnraul.com/media-player-classic-still-the-best-media-player-%e2%80%93-even-in-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media player classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnraul.com/blog/media-player-classic-still-the-best-media-player-%e2%80%93-even-in-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even before when I was still using Windows XP, I loved collecting downloaded video files from torrent sites. Video files such as Hollywood movies, Japanese anime and TV show series. I’ve come across different media players and sought for one...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even before when I was still using <a title="Windows XP" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_xp">Windows XP</a>, I loved collecting downloaded video files from torrent sites. Video files such as Hollywood movies, Japanese anime and TV show series. I’ve come across different media players and sought for one that would match the performance I need. And the winner: none other than the simple-looking opensource media player, the <a title="Media Player Classic" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_player_classic">Media Player Classic</a>.</p>
<p> <span id="more-33"></span>If you prefer media player looks over performance (that is, you are inclined to love a player by its design over its speed and capabilities), you might not like Media Player Classic as much as you do with other media players. Commercial media players usually reign the graphical user interface (GUI) department and unfortunately, Media Player Classic was not developed for it.
</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img height="313" alt="Media Player Classic" src="http://www.johnraul.com/images/media-player-classic.jpg" width="430" border="0" /></p>
<p>Media Player Classic’s design was aimed to mimic the simplicity of the old Windows Media Player 6.4. However, it boasts a set of additional features that is hard to find in an in-built media player: a native DVD-support with real-time zoom, support for AVI subtitles, QuickTime and RealVideo support (requires QuickTime and/or Real Player), and built-in MPEG2/SVCD/DVD codec.</p>
<p>What captivated me most of Media Player Classic is its speed. Even now that I’m already using <a title="Windows Vista" href="http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_vista">Windows Vista</a>, and there are lots of modern players, they are still unable to knock out Media Player Classic’s leadership in speed. The program is very fast and movie files are loaded almost instantly when you hit the play button.</p>
<p>I therefore encourage you to try Media Player Classic now. It&#8217;s the best for me. You’ll see what I mean when you start experiencing its playback performance and you will strongly like it.</p>
<p><a title="Media Player Classic" href="http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=82303&amp;package_id=84358">Click here to download Media Player Classic</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnraul.com/media-player-classic-still-the-best-media-player-%e2%80%93-even-in-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solve Your Hard Disk Mysteries With WinDirStat</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/solve-your-hard-disk-mysteries-with-windirstat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnraul.com/solve-your-hard-disk-mysteries-with-windirstat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windirstat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnraul.com/blog/solve-your-hard-disk-mysteries-with-windirstat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few days ago, I wrote a post about Paint.NET, the amazing opensource graphics editing program meant for Windows operating system. After I wrote that, I realized I’ve gotten in love with opensource applications so here I am bringing you another...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few days ago, <a href="http://johnraul.com/paint-dot-net-less-than-photoshop-better-than-paint/">I wrote a post about Paint.NET</a>, the amazing opensource graphics editing program meant for Windows operating system. After I wrote that, I realized I’ve gotten in love with <a title="Opensource Applications" href="http://http://johnraul.com/blog/tag/opensource/">opensource applications</a> so here I am bringing you another nifty program: <a href="http://windirstat.info">WinDirStat</a>!</p>
<p>To tell you: WinDirStat is not new, but probably this could be the first time you heard about this program. WinDirStat basically will solve your hard disk mysteries by letting you see your hard disk’s contents in a “bird-eye” view. If ever wondered where your space has gone off or if you want to know which file is eating your space away, this program will help you identify it. Yes, no more hard disk mysteries, bar none.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.johnraul.com/images/windirstat-hard-disk-select.jpg" border="0" alt="WinDirStat Hard Disk Selection" width="430" height="332" /></p>
<p>The first screen you’ll encounter is the hard disk selection (shown in a list above). You will see multiple entries if you have more than one hard disk drives. In my case I only have one, and there is less than three gigabytes remaining space on my 80 GB laptop hard disk drive. This is where the mystery kicks in: how come my hard disk is almost full? I will let WinDirStat solve this for me.</p>
<p><span id="more-29"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.johnraul.com/images/windirstat-hard-disk-analyze.jpg" border="0" alt="WinDirStat Hard Disk Analysis" width="551" height="210" /></p>
<p>While the program is analyzing my hard disk, a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacman">cute Pacman-looking image</a> runs back and forth (it replaces the typical progress bar I expected to see). After the analysis, you would see a colorful graphics chart representing the size of files in your hard disk. Big squares mean big file sizes and small ones are usually simple word documents or link library files in your operating system. Clicking specifically on a square will let you know the filename and file size – thus, revealing the truth of the hard disk mystery. Nice, isn’t it?</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.johnraul.com/images/windirstat-hard-disk-results.jpg" border="0" alt="WinDirStat Hard Disk Results" width="544" height="289" /></p>
<p>Now, WinDirStat can be downloaded for only 630 kilobytes – yes, just like that. It’s free but useful utility. It runs on all Windows systems (it works OK on <a title="Windows Vista" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_vista">Windows Vista</a>). You can visit <a href="http://windirstat.info/">WinDirStat’s official website here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://windirstat.info/wds_current_setup.exe">Click here to download WinDirStat.</a></p>
<p>Try this program and drop a comment after you see for yourself how great it is. Two thumbs up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnraul.com/solve-your-hard-disk-mysteries-with-windirstat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paint.NET: Less Than Photoshop, Better Than Paint</title>
		<link>http://www.johnraul.com/paint-dot-net-less-than-photoshop-better-than-paint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnraul.com/paint-dot-net-less-than-photoshop-better-than-paint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opensource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paint.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnraul.com/blog/paint-dot-net-less-than-photoshop-better-than-paint/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve never been a fan of open source programs until recently because I grew up in the world of proprietary Windows-based applications. Curious and incredulous, I surfed the Web to take a sneak peak of the beauty of these “free-to-use”...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve never been a fan of open source programs until recently because I grew up in the world of proprietary Windows-based applications. Curious and incredulous, I surfed the Web to take a sneak peak of the beauty of these “free-to-use” programs, though I knew it isn’t new, I was surprised how robust they are.</p>
<p>The open source program that awed me is called Paint.NET, a raster graphics editing program for Windows, developed under .NET Framework using C# and C++ languages. When I saw the program running on my screen for the first time, I doubted if the program is really free – and it really is.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.johnraul.com/images/paint-dot-net-interface.jpg" border="0" alt="Paint.NET User Interface" /></p>
<p>Paint.NET program has a familiar user interface. The toolbox looks similar to that of Photoshop. The whole program looks actually like a downsized <a title="Adobe Photoshop" href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/index.html">Adobe Photoshop</a> version. It supports layers as well, transparency, blending, plug-in and has dozens of in-built image effects to choose from. The program is amazingly fast and lightweight. <a title="Download Paint.NET" href="http://www.getpaint.net/download.html#Download">Paint.NET can be downloaded here</a> for only 1.6 MB disk space.</p>
<p><span id="more-26"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://johnraul.com/images/paint-dot-net-adjustments.jpg" border="0" alt="Paint.NET Adjustment Options" width="273" height="205" /></p>
<p>I love Paint.NET because of the following things:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Better than Paint</strong> – if you are still using Microsoft Paint until now, you’re still in the cave. Paint.NET provides many image and photo editing functionalities that Microsoft would never put on their paint.</li>
<li> <strong>Frequent Updates</strong> – I love the creators of this program. They keep on upgrading this free application and adding new features. Probably better than being stuck in the simplicity of Microsoft Paint. lol</li>
<li><strong>Less than Photoshop, But Free</strong> – Professionally, I use Photoshop for my graphics editing needs. However, I got the benefits because I paid for them. With Paint.NET, you’ll get dozens of Photoshop effects and filters without stripping out your wallet.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://johnraul.com/images/paint-dot-net-effects.jpg" alt="Paint.NET Effects" width="367" height="242" /></p>
<p>You will appreciate for yourself when you try running this great program. Paint.NET opened my eyes that I would never ever underestimate the power of open source applications because they could contend, in a way, far better than the ones created by commercial companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnraul.com/paint-dot-net-less-than-photoshop-better-than-paint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

